Every 11 seconds on Wall street, someone has the thought “There are billions of dollars tied up in public education that I can’t make more money on using the money I already have.” The phrase “Corporate education” does not sit comfortably with most voters on both sides of the political divide and so right-wing parties and their financial market friends around the globe try to disguise corporate education models under better sounding social initiatives, such as “School choice.” Trump obviously hasn’t had a thought about education and so has borrowed one from the Koch brothers.
Learning is first about money making
It’s Facebook that personifies the idea that all human activity should now be monetised as the social-media giant indirectly makes money on every photo and comment we upload. [Note: The scary prospect of how much money Trump made Facebook in the last 18 months.] So why shouldn’t the activity of learning be any different? Kids learn while rich investors make money! Sounds wonderful, doesn’t it? So, with Republicans in control of every level of government and federal “School choice” almost inevitable, it’s worth looking into whether it works in practice.
This is where I could stop writing and just ask you to Google it. It takes the most basic Google searches to discover that all these market-driven policies are made to sound nice but do the exact opposite they claim to. Like all right-wing policies, they never allow for natural human behaviour such as personal and organisational self-preservation, and greed. This was made clear in “The maestro” Alan Greenspan’s comments on the (his) 2008 global financial crisis, “I made a mistake in trusting the banks would act in the best interests of their investors.” Even the wikipedia page on School choice goes to great length at explaining how the policy doesn’t work!
“Many of the current school choice models do not offer transportation to out-of-neighborhood schools, which discourages low-income families from selecting schools outside of their neighborhoods. The “free market” created by school choice models is inherently unequal.” – Wikipedia
The thought that I could save American education by simply asking Donald to go read Wikipedia sounds crazy but his lack of awareness of world issues and life on earth in general, he proved during campaigning, shows me that he’s never read wikipedia anyhow. The problem America has is that the political discussion is always centred on the funding and organisational structure of education, rather than the experience one receives in the classroom. My own country New Zealand outperforms the US on every indicator at a fraction of the cost. We are worried firstly about what happens in the classroom and how engaged and involved individual children are in their own learning. We can only do this because we have no external pressures from third party interests, such as lobbying corporations like Pearson. Teachers know education better than corporations and business leaders and it’s teachers who run education in New Zealand.
If you want to know how to improve education for all at a fraction of the cost, learn from New Zealand. I just happen to written a book on the subject, in which I cover how we organise and fund public education to be one of the best in the world.
There’s more on future education in my book: A Learner’s Paradise: How New Zealand is reimagining education.